To: Elections @ cambridge dot gov dot uk, copied to the local opposition on the City Council.
I wasn’t very impressed to have the City Council Newsletter – “Cambridge Matters” delivered by hand though my door on the morning of election day.
It’s full of charts and articles trying to show how great the current council is.
It has a “Liberal yellow” banner across the top.
I don’t think it was appropriate for the Council to be delivering this newsletter on Election Day, and can’t imagine it was co-incidence.
Richard Taylor
Cambridge.
5 responses to “Cambridge Matters – Distribution on Election Day”
I didn’t post the response I got at the time:
I received a follow up stating:
Cambridge Matters is published four times per year. The magazine is currently costing taxpayers £38,500 per year and that figure excludes staff costs. The in-house advertising budget was supposed to be £755 per issue. In issue 16 the council spent £1804 and in issue 17, £2,284.
There is a hole in the accounts of £28,000 which has been dug since 2004.
All councillors have been sent detailed accounts on the magazine. Let’s see how many really care about taxpayer’s money.
The magazine’s main purpose is to keep the Lib Dems in power at taxpayer’s expense.
Paul Harvey
CB1 7AR
38.5k a year sounds fine to me. I bet it would cost at least 50p/person/year to put out the recycling info alone (which wouldn’t attract any advertising) and which is necessary for the recycling system to run.
A major aspect of the problem Mr Harvey is drawing attention to is that councillors aren’t clearly being told either the full cost to the city council, or the full cost to the taxpayer of the publication.
The question of using the tax-payer funded magazine for political gain is also important; especially as the magazine has been (from the next issue) moved away from focusing on recycling to a broader commentary on the council under the control of the council leader.