Cambridge MP Daniel Zeichner has had the opportunity to take part in twenty-one votes this month while debating a Bill to give the Prime Minister the power to start the process of the UK leaving the European Union:
- 1 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted against empowering the Prime Minister to give notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
- 1 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted against empowering the Prime Minister to give notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
- 1 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted against a proposed timetable for European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill (More…)
- 6 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) did not vote when the majority of MPs voted against only allowing the Prime Minister to give notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union a month after the approach to, and objectives for, withdrawal negotiations have been agreed by representatives of the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland administrations. (More…)
- 6 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require a report on the effect of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU on the National Assembly for Wales’ block grant before allowing the Prime Minister to to give notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
- 6 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require an undertaking to keep the Houses of Parliament informed about withdrawal negotiations before allowing the Prime Minister to give notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
- 6 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require the UK Government to take into account the views of representatives of the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland administrations when negotiating and concluding any agreements with the European Commission relating to the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. (More…)
- 7 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require Parliamentary approval of any new treaty of relationship with the European Union following the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from European Union membership. (More…)
- 7 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge), did not vote when the majority of MPs voted not to prevent the Prime Minister giving notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union if the European Council have not undertaken that if the United Kingdom Parliament doesn’t agree the terms of the United Kingdom’s leaving of the European Union the United Kingdom’s will remain an EU member under the existing terms. (More…)
- 7 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to make the publication of any impact assessment, prepared since 23 June 2016, on the UK’s future trading relationship with the EU a prerequisite for the Prime Minister giving notification of the UK’s intent to withdraw from the EU. (More…)
- 7 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) did not vote when the majority of MPs voted not to make publication of an assessment of the financial liability of the UK towards the EU, and a statement on the economic impact of the UK leaving the single market, a prerequisite for the Prime Minister giving notification of the UK’s intention to withdraw from the EU. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require the Prime Minister to give a series of undertakings before giving notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require ministers comply with the European Union Code of Conduct on Business Taxation and consider the public interest in maintaining all existing EU tax avoidance and evasion legislation when negotiating the terms of the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to make consultation with the Government of Gibraltar a prerequisite for the Prime Minister giving notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require a report on the impact of the United Kingdom leaving the European Union on national finances including health spending. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to require a report on a referendum for ratifying the United Kingdom’s new relationship with the European Union. (More…)
Zeichner was one of only 19 Labour MPs to support the amendment put forward by Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron. - 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted for notice of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU to preserve rights acquired in Northern Ireland as a result of European Union membership and to preserve the right of the people of Northern Ireland determine for themselves if they prefer a union with Great Britain or a sovereign united Ireland. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted against empowering the Prime Minister to give notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted to seek to protect the residence rights of citizens of the European Union and their family members who were lawfully resident in the United Kingdom on 23 June 2016. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted for the UK to remain member of the European Atomic Agency Community (Euratom) when withdrawing from the European Union and to treat leaving Euratom separately from leaving the European Union. (More…)
- 8 Feb 2017: Daniel Zeichner MP (Cambridge) voted against empowering the Prime Minister to give notification of the United Kingdom’s intention to leave the European Union. (More…)
Information re-presented from Daniel Zeichner MP, Cambridge’s voting record on PublicWhip. See also: How Daniel Zeichner voted on Foreign Policy and Defence on TheyWorkForYou.com.
One response to “Cambridge MP Daniel Zeichner’s EU Withdrawal Bill Votes in February 2017”
While each statement above has been carefully written, and there are links to support what’s written, given our defamation laws the risk vs benefit of publishing an article like this doesn’t really make publication rational.
I’m asking myself why I have taken a risk which could dramatically change my life and leave me in poverty?
Participating in our democracy, and taking part in life itself, isn’t risk free. What’s the morally defensible alternative?